기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
대기업 프로젝트 팀의 다양성, 심리적 안전이 창의성 및 학습행동에 미치는 영향: 창의성의 매개효과를 중심으로
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 대기업 프로젝트 팀의 다양성, 심리적 안전이 창의성 및 학습행동에 미치는 영향: 창의성의 매개효과를 중심으로
  • The Effects of Diversity and Psychological Safety on Creativity and Learning Behavior of Project Teams in Large Corporations - Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Creativity
저자명
김민지,김진모
간행물명
기업교육과 인재연구KCI
권/호정보
2014년|16권 2호(통권30호)|pp.57-88 (32 pages)
발행정보
한국기업교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.73MB)
주제분야
교육학
원문 미리보기는 1페이지만 제공 됩니다. 전체 페이지 보기를 원하실 경우 다운로드열람하기를 이용해 주세요.
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구의 목적은 첫째, 우리나라 대기업 프로젝트 팀의 학습행동과 다양성, 심리적 안전 및 창의성의 인과모형을 설정하고 변인 간 인과관계를 적합하게 예측하는지 살펴보고, 둘째, 팀의 학습행동, 다양성, 심리적 안전 및 창의성 간의 영향 관계를 규명하고, 셋째, 팀의 다양 성과 심리적 안전 및 학습행동의 관계에서 창의성이 나타내는 매개효과를 검증하는 데 있었 다. 이를 위하여 국내 대기업의 프로젝트 팀에게 설문조사를 실시하여 총 16개 대기업 77개 프로젝트 팀의 222명 응답자들의 자료를 토대로 구조방정식 모형 분석을 실시한 결과, 대기 업 프로젝트 팀의 창의성과 학습행동은 정적 관련성이 있었고, 팀 다양성과 심리적 안전은 창의성과 정적 관련성이 있었다. 또한 팀 창의성은 심리적 안전과 학습행동의 관계에서 매개 역할을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과를 토대로 본 연구의 시사점과 제한점 및 추 후 연구과제에 대해 논의하였다.

영문초록

In this study, the causal relationships among the team learning behavior, diversity, psychological safety, and creativity of project teams in large corporations are examined. The hypotheses were tested by utilizing SEM using a dataset from 67 project teams working in 16 large corporations in Korea. According to the results, team creativity has a positive effect on the team learning behavior of a project team, whereas team diversity and psychological safety were found to have no effect. The results also show that both team diversity and psychological safety have a positive effect on the team creativity of a project team, while only the degree of team psychological safety has an indirect effect on learning behavior through team creativity. The implications and limitations of this research are discussed.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경과 가설의 설정
Ⅲ. 연구 방법
Ⅳ. 연구 결과
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (86건)

  • 김계수 (2009). (AMOS/LISREL) 잠재성장 모델링과 구조방정식 모델 분석. 서울: 한나래.
  • 김문주 (2010). 팀 다양성과 팀 공유감이 팀 효과성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 팀 학습의 매개효과를 중심으로. 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문.
  • 김왕배, 이경용 (2002). 사회자본으로서의 신뢰와 조직몰입. 한국사회학, 36(3), 1-23.
  • 김지근, 이기학 (2011). 부․모의 자율성 지지와 진로결정에의 몰입의 모형 검증: 자기성장주도성과 환경에 대한 진로탐색행동 및 자신에 대한 진로탐색행동을 매개변인으로. 상담학연구, 12(1), 81-97.
  • 노풍두, 조용곤, 조근태 (2011). 조직의 창의성 수준 평가 모델 개발. 기술혁신학회지, 14(1), 109-138.
  • 류형선, 하주현, 이병임 (2012). 의사결정능력과 대인관계능력이 집단창의성에 미치는 영향. 창의력교육연구, 12(2), 25-43.
  • 박희진 (2009). 팀 구성원들의 교류기억과 팀 멘탈모델의 관계: 팀 학습행동의 매개를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 22(4), 597-623.
  • 박희진 (2011). 팀 학습 행동과 팀 수행의 관계: 메타분석. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 24(3), 651-672.
  • 배병렬 (2011). (Amos 19) 구조방정식 모델링: 원리와 실제. 서울: 도서출판 청람.
  • 유영만 (1995). 학습체제로서의 조직: 학습조직에 대한 시론적 논의. 교수공학연구, 3(1), 167-193.
  • 이준호, 이진규, 김학수, 박지환 (2011). 연구개발팀의 다양성과 응집성이 팀 창의성에 미치는 영향: 창의적 역할모델로서 리더기능의 조절효과. 조직과 인사관리연구, 35(3), 171-197.
  • 이철영, 이근형 (2009). 광고전략 기획자의 심리적 속성이 창의성과 지각된 업무성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증적 연구. 광고연구, 83, 219-253.
  • 임성만 (2004). 조직 신뢰와 구성원 신뢰의 기반 요인 및 관계성. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
  • 전영욱, 김진모 (2009). 팀 학습에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 구조분석. Andragogy Today: International Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, 12(4), 115-146.
  • 최성락 (2000). 집단창의성 지각의 영향요인에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
  • 천용찬 (2012). 창의적 성과에 영향을 주는 조직창의성 요인들의 영향관계 규명. 성균관대학교 석사학위논문.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.
  • Argote, L., Gruenfeld, D, & Naquin, C. (2001). Group learning in organizations, In M. Turner (Ed.). Groups at work: Advances in theory and research. NY: Erlbaum.
  • Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 363-376.
  • Argyris, D., & Schőn, D. L. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421-458.
  • Bassett-Jones, N. (2005). The paradox of diversity management, creativity and innovation. Creativity and Innovation Managemeng, 14(2), 169-175.
  • Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity, New York: Free Press.
  • Bowers, C. A., Pharmer, J. A., & Salas, E. (2000). When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 31(3), 305-327.
  • Brattstrőm, A., Lőfsten, H., & Richtner, A. (2012). Creativity, trust and systematic processes in product development. Research Policy, 41, 743-755.
  • Brown, R. B., & Woodland, M. J. (1999). Managing knowledge wisely: A case study in organisational behaviour. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 8(2), 175-198.
  • Chen, M. H. (2006). Understanding the benefits and detriments of conflict on team creativity process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 105-116.
  • Clark, M. A. (2001). Perceived relational diversity: A fit conceptualization. Unpublished Doctral Dissertation, Arizona State University.
  • Cohendet, P., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2000). The codification of knowledge: A conceptual and empirical exploration. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 195-209.
  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., White, R. E., & Djurfeldt, L. (1995). Organizational learning: Dimensions for a theory. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(4), 337-360.
  • Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2008). Organization development & change (9th ed). Maison, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
  • Cunha, P. V., & Louro, M. J. (2000). Building teams that learn. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(1), 152-153. de Bono, E. (1996). Serious creativity. London: HarperCollins Business.
  • Dechant, K., Marsick, V. J., & Kasl, E. (1993). Towards a model of team learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 15(1), 1-14.
  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
  • Egan, T. M. (2005). Creativity in the context of team diversity: Team leader perspectives. Advances in Developing human Resources, 7(2), 207-225.
  • Eskildsen, J. K., Dahlgaard, J. J., & Norgaard, A. (1999). The impact of creativity and learning on business excellence. Total Quality Management, 10, 523-530.
  • Fagan, M. H. (2004), The influence of creative style and climate on software development team creativity: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44, 73-80.
  • Ferrel, T. A. (1996). Creativity in the workplace: The impact of the work environment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Kansas State University.
  • Fiol, C. M. (1994). Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 5(3), 403-420.
  • Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task performing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65-97.
  • Gibson, C., & Vermeulen, F. (2003). A heathy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 202-239.
  • Glynn, M. A., Lant, T. K., & Milliken, F. J. (1994). Mapping learning processes in organizations: A multi-level framework linking learning and organizing, In C. Stubbart, J. Meindl, & J. Porac(Eds.), Advances in Managerial Cognition and Organizational Info
  • Golembiewski, R. T., & McConkie, M. L. (1975). The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes, In C. L. Cooper(Ed.), Theories of Group Processes, New York: Wiley.
  • Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. W. Jr. (1992). Management (6th ed). Boston: Addison Wesley.
  • Hong, S., Malik, M. L., & Lee, M. K. (2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using non-western sample. Educational and Psychology Measurement, 63(4), 636-654.
  • Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2, 88-115.
  • Huber, G. P. (1999). Facilitating project team learning and contributions to organizational knowledge. Creativity and Innovation Management, 8(2), 70-76.
  • Jackson, S. E. (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams, In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology, UK: Wiley.
  • Janis, I. (1982). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
  • Jelinek, M. (1979). Institutionalizing Innovation: A study of organizational learning systems. New York: Praeger.
  • Justensen, S. L. (2001). Innoversity: A study of the dynamics inherent in the relationship between innovation and diversity. MPP Working Paper, Copenhagen Business School, 6.
  • Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
  • Kilduff, M., Angelmar, R. & Mehra, A. (2000). Top management-team diversity and firm performance: Examining the role of cognitions. Organization Science, 11(1), 21-34.
  • Klein, J. K., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211-236.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). 구조방정식의 원리와 적용(이현숙 외 역). 서울: 학지사.
  • Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-98.
  • Leonard, D., & Swap, W. (1999). When sparks fly: Igniting creativity in groups. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
  • Liang, T. P., Jiang, J., Klein, G. S., & Lie, Y. C. (2010). Software quality as influenced by informational diversity, task conflict, and learning in project teams. IEEE: Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(3), 477-487.
  • Lindell, M. K., & Brandt, C. J. (1999). Assessing interrater agreement on the job relevance of a test: A comparison of the CVI, T, , and indexes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 640-647.
  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization's learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132-151.
  • McCarthy, A., & Garavan, T. N. (2008). Team learning and metacognition: A neglected area of HRD research and practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(4), 509-524.
  • McDermott, R., & O'Dell, C. (2001). Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 76-85.
  • Miliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402-433.
  • Miliken, F. J., Bartel, C. A., & Kurtzberg, T. R. (2003). Diversity and creativity in work groups, In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration, New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
  • Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., Mohrman, A. D. (1995). Designing team-based organizations, new forms for knowledge work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • O'Reilly, C. A., Williams, K. Y., & Barsade, S. (1998). Group demography and innovation: Does diversity help?, In M. A. Neale, & D. A. Mannix (Eds.), Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Greenwich: JAI.
  • Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(2), 237-262.
  • Payne, R. L. (1990). The effectiveness of research teams, In M. A. West and J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, Chichester: Wiley.
  • Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615-631.
  • Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2008). 조직행동론(김광점, 박노윤, 설현도 역). 서울: 시그마프레스(원저 2008 출판).
  • Savelsbergh, C. M. J. H., van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Poell, R. F. (2009). The development and empirical validation of a multidimensional measurement instrument for team learning behaviors. Small Group Research, 40(5), 578-607.
  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
  • Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1709-1721.
  • Staw, B. M. (1990). An Evolutionary approach to creativity and innovation, In M. A. West, & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315-330.
  • Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37(5), 490-521.
  • Van der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance on multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 532-547.
  • Van Offenbeek, M. (2001). Processes and outcomes of team learning. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(3), 303-317.
  • Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.
  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
  • Yeh, Y. J., & Chou, H. W. (2005). Team composition and learning behaviors in cross-functional teams. Social Behavior and Personality, 33(4), 391-402.
  • Yoon, S. W., Song, J. H., Lim, D. H., & Joo, B. K. (2010). Structural determinants of team performance: The mutual influences of learning culture, creativity, and knowledge. Human Resource Development International, 13(3), 249-264.
  • Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 353-376.