기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
The long-term clinical stability of implants placed with ridge splitting technique
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • The long-term clinical stability of implants placed with ridge splitting technique
  • 치조능 분리술을 이용해 식립된 임프란트의 장기간의 임상적 안정성
저자명
Jae-Min Yoon,Young-taek Kim,Yong-ju Jang,Jung-chul Park,Seong-ho Choi,Kyoo-sung Cho,Chang-sung Kim
간행물명
Journal of Dental Implant Research
권/호정보
2011년|30권 1호(통권35호)|pp.1-8 (8 pages)
발행정보
대한치과이식임플란트학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트(0.61MB)
주제분야
의약학
원문 미리보기는 1페이지만 제공 됩니다. 전체 페이지 보기를 원하실 경우 다운로드열람하기를 이용해 주세요.
서지반출

영문초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical stability of implants placed with a ridge splitting technique through the investigation of the survival rate and marginal bone loss of implants. Methods: 34 implants were placed in 20 patients with the ridge splitting technique. 8 out of 34 implants were placed with the nonsubmerged approach. 26 out of 34 implants were placed with the submerged approach. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) and bone graft were applied in 13 implants. Results: A prosthetic procedure was performed on average 7.9 °æ 3.0 months after placement. The average follow up period was 4.2 °æ 2.1 years. During the follow up, the cumulative survival rate of implants was 100%. The mean marginal bone loss of implants was 1.57 °æ 1.44 mm at the mesial side and 1.42 °æ 1.48 mm at the distal side. In non-submerged implants, the mean marginal bone loss was 1.17 mm and 0.70 mm on the mesial and the distal sides, respectively. In submerged implants, the loss was 1.74 mm and 1.59 mm on the mesial and the distal sides, respectively. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Complications during implant placement surgery, buccal bone dehiscence, fenestration, and buccal bone plate fracture, occurred with 5 implants. In those implants, the mean marginal bone loss was 1.73 mm and 1.90 mm on mesial and distal sides, respectively. In implants without complications, the mean marginal bone loss was 1.57 mm and 1.26 mm on the mesial and the distal side, respectively. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusions: Within limits of this study, considering the results of this study, the ridge splitting technique has a long-term clinical stability to place the implant at the narrow alveolar ridge. [THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY 2011;30(1):1-8]

목차

INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Conclusion
REFERENCES

구매하기 (3,000)